No Room: The Inn

She wrapped him in cloths and placed him in a manger, because there was no room for them in the inn. – Luke 2:7

It is a scene that has been well rehearsed in our consciousness: Mary and Joseph, weary from their travels, knocking at the door of the inn, only to be denied entry. Mary, great with child, a look of quiet calm written on her face; Joseph, on the other hand, receives the inn-keeper’s words less graciously. “There is no room for you here.” It would seem Bethlehem was the ancestral home of many a 1st century Hebrew. Luke tells us that Caesar Augustus issued an imperial edict that “all the world should be registered,” (2:1), a decree befitting the prerogative of empire. Off-stage, Caesar Augustus beckons his subjects to yield to his sovereignty, to return home, to be counted among the citizens of Rome. Luke contrasts Caesar with another sovereign ruler who bids his followers to also return, to be counted not among the citizens of Rome, but the Kingdom of God.

“There is no room for you here.”

Maybe it was a sincere gesture; maybe it was to placate them; personally, I think he was just trying to get rid of them. Whatever his motive, the inn-keeper suggests the young husband bed down with his pregnant wife in the manger. The stable. With the animals. Scholars tell us the manger likely amounted to little more than a small cave. In contrast to the “good news” from Rome, this evangelion has import even for lowly shepherds. The one who was sent to proclaim “good news to the poor” identifies with the impoverished even at his birth. From the beginning, it seems, Jesus was a displaced person, one for whom the world will not make a place.

“There is no room for you here.”

How many times would He hear those words?

How often does He hear them still?

Posted in Devotional, Gospel, Jesus, Poverty, Scripture, Social Issues | 2 Comments

Kurt Being Kurt

Two athletes made headlines this week for the multi-million dollar contracts they signed. Both of them are nearing the end of their careers. Both are among the best at what they do. And both of them will be greatly compensated for their ability to continue to perform at a high level over the next 24 months.

But only one of these athletes will I let my son emulate.

Kurt Warner rose to prominence in 1999 when incumbent St. Louis Rams QB Trent Green became Wally Pipp to Warner’s Lou Gehrig. Warner, a former Arena leaguer and NFL Europe star, stepped in for the injured Green and transformed the St. Louis Rams into Super Bowl champions. His grocery-store-stock-boy-to-NFL-quarterback story was heartwarming, but it is Warner’s character, demonstrated by his myriad off-field civic contributions, that make him a true hero. His First Things First Foundation, inspired by the words of Jesus found in Matthew 6.33, is involved in a variety of projects, including Home for the Holidays (an effort to provide affordable housing to low-income, single parent families), the Special Olympics, and a variety of children’s hospitals throughout the country. For his on- and off-field contributions, Warner was recently recognized by the National Football League as the Walter Payton Man of the Year.

Manny Ramirez, on the other hand, has long been the epitome of the self-aggrandizing modern day athlete. Make no mistake; Manny is a world class talent. But he is many other things as well: moody, selfish, pouty, a distraction. For all that he is, perhaps Manny will be most remembered for what he is not: a gamer. After begging out of the lineup against the Yankees in the summer of ’03 because of a sore throat, Manny was spotted that same evening at a local bar with a friend. Too sick to play, but not to sick to carouse with a pal, it seems. Despite being paid an average of $20 million per season by the Boston Red Sox for the past 8 years, Manny’s displeasure over the “disrespect” he had been shown by team management led him to quit on his team. He refused to play; he refused to run out ground balls; he even refused to do what he does best: swing the bat. In the end, Manny got what he wanted: a trade to another city and another fat (albeit shorter than he wanted) contract. “Manny Being Manny” is his catchphrase to describe his antics. Indeed, Manny has always been and always will be about Manny and nothing else.

This week, Warner took less money to stay in Arizona in a situation where he was happy. In a move that is simply unheard of in today’s economy, Warner offered to leave money on the table if the team would commit to allocating that money in an effort to re-sign Anquan Boldin, one of Warner’s top wide receivers. Sure, Warner still received a king’s ransom to play a kid’s game. But now that I have a son who is all too quick to idolize the athletes he sees on SportsCenter, I’m glad I can point him toward Kurt Warner, a man who plays and lives with integrity and respect.

Just call it Kurt being Kurt.

Posted in Sports | 2 Comments

Real Love Hurts

Give until it hurts, because real love hurts.
Mother Teresa
Posted in Quotes | Leave a comment

Lost Season Five: LaFleur

Last night’s episode, “LaFleur”, was the halfway-point in what has been a trippy, time-traveling season of veritable geekiness. And if I’m being honest, after a half-season of quantum physics and “where are they now?” dystopia, I was ready for a good ol’ character-centric flashback / flashforward episode. In “LaFleur”, we finally find out what happened to Sawyer, Juliet, Jin, Miles, and Farraday after Locke “saved” them by turning the frozen donkey wheel. The episode focused primarily on Sawyer, the erstwhile bad boy who seems to have embraced his inner leader in the 1970s Dharma era. It’s interesting that James uses his con man skills — the same skills that got him in trouble with the law in the first place and ultimately led him to the Island — to save not only himself but to concoct a lie to save his fellow time-travelers as well. In this sense, Sawyer parallels Jack (who hatched the lie the Oceanic 6 have been hiding behind for the past three years). It looks like both of those lies will come to a head next week as the arrival of Jack, Kate, and the rest of the gang will surely put Sawyer’s lie to the test. Indeed, the truth will find you out.

The episode begins with a recap of when we last saw our castaways. Locke descends into the well, the sky flashes, and “the record skips”. Our castaways are deposited at a point in time much earlier than any other point we’ve seen thus far, as evidenced by the gigantic monolith they see towering over the Island. We’re left with the assumption that this is the same four-toed statue from the Season Two finale (although we didn’t get a shot of his feet). The statue looks Egyptian; perhaps a representation of the Egyptian god Anibus or Horus. According to wikipedia (via my friend Skid), the “Eye of Horus” became an important Egyptian symbol of power. In an ancient battle for the throne of Egypt, Horus suffered an injury to his eye. After his eye was healed by Hathor, the eye of Horus became a symbol of renewal. How many times have we seen an opening shot of someone’s eye? Wasn’t Hurley drawing pictures of a pyramid a few weeks ago? Weren’t there Egyptian hieroglyphs in the Hatch in Season Two? Weren’t there also hieroglyphs down in the frozen donkey wheel chamber? Are we supposed to make a Horus / Horace connection in this episode? Hmmm…

When Locke turns the wheel down below, the Left Behinders are dropped off (for good?) in the year 1974. Doc Jensen of EW posits that “1974 is when / where the castaways were always and immediately supposed to have gone when Ben turned the donkey wheel last season. They didn’t because of two mistakes that required elaborate course correction: Locke not turning the wheel, and the Oceanic 6 (plus Desmond and Lapidus) leaving.” That makes sense to me. We learn that the 1974 Dharma Initiative had reached some sort of truce with the Richard Alpert-led “hostiles”. Just before Sawyer and Juliet saved Michelle Dessler from certain doom (Sawyer is the new Jack Bauer), Farraday delivered what may be the most telling line of the night: “Whatever happened, happened.” I suspect the rest of this season will be dealing with the issue of whether the past / future can be altered, or does everything default back to a path of known outcomes and “course corrections”. Personally, I place myself squarely in the camp that says it CAN be altered.

(By the way, if these “hostiles” are the ones who killed Paul, aren’t they responsible for breaking the truce?)

Meanwhile, in our new 1977 timeline, Sawyer and the gang have seamlessly integrated themselves into the Dharma Initiative. My favorite moment of the night: Juliet succesfully delivering Amy and Horace’s baby. What a relief that must’ve been for her, after years of watching similar scenarios end in tragedy. Big question: who is this child? A son, born in 1977. I suppose there are several possibilities. Ethan, perhaps? Someone else?

The episode closed with the moment we’ve been waiting for all season: a castaway reunion (of sorts). Sawyer’s look when he saw Kate told the whole story. Personally, I like him with Juliet. But it should be interesting to see where this thing goes from here.

Posted in Television | 6 Comments

Moving

Sometime in the next few days, I’m going to follow my wife’s lead and I’ll be moving to a new blogspot address. When we both started our blogs, we selected blogspot addresses that contained our full names; probably not the smartest idea. Since the little lady was able to successfully (and rather painlessly) move her site to a new address, I’ve decided to do the same thing.

Once I decide on a new blog address, I’ll send out an email to all my friends and known readers. If you’re a follower of this blog and you’d like to be included in the email, leave me a comment and I’ll be sure to keep you informed about “where” I’ll be moving to. Otherwise, this web address will be non-existent in a couple of days. That is, until another Jason Bybee out there decides to take up the craft of blogging.

Au revoir.

Posted in Blogging, Sunny | 13 Comments

Archive: Bring Them to Jesus

Tomorrow morning, I’ll be preaching at our annual Children’s Day service. I was going back through my blog archives and I came across this post I made two years ago. I wanted to post it here again, basically to serve as a reminder of the incredible calling we have to bring the little ones to Jesus.

I wish I was preaching this in the morning…
____________________

The portrait of Jesus in Mark 10 is one of my favorites. The disciples have been arguing about their place in the Kingdom. The Pharisees continue to seek out Jesus in order to test him. As the rich young ruler is waiting on deck to prove himself, Jesus is spending time with the children.

13 People were bringing little children to Jesus for him to place his hands on them, but the disciples rebuked them. 14 When Jesus saw this, he was indignant. He said to them, “Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of God belongs to such as these. 15 Truly I tell you, anyone who will not receive the kingdom of God like a little child will never enter it.” 16 And he took the children in his arms, placed his hands on them and blessed them. (TNIV) 

The ancient attitude toward children was much different than ours. In Greek society, the one-child family was most common. Infanticide was rampant. Unwanted children were often left on trash heaps or in some isolated place. Others were sold to slave traders. The boys were put to work in hard labor as soon as they were old enough. The girls were put to work, too, but in a different vocation, their innocence taken from them much too early.

This is the context we are transported into in Mark 10. And yet, the Gospel writer uses children to paint a portrait of discipleship. As others clamor around Jesus to satiate their self-serving purposes, Jesus blesses these little ones who freely receive the gift of the Kingdom. The weakest, most insignificant, most vulnerable members of society are lauded as paragons of discipleship.

Notice what the text says: “People were bringing little children to Jesus.” I’m convinced the best thing we can do for our children is to bring them to Jesus. I believe that with all of my heart and I’m thankful for each parent, minister, coach and teacher who will participate in the spiritual development of my children. If you’re going to be one of those people for my children, then I thank you in advance.

But I can’t just read this passage as a father. I must also read it as a disciple. This passage is far deeper than my individualistic interpretation of it. There’s a local and even a global dimension to discipleship. The greatest thing we can do for the children of Huntsville is to bring them to Jesus. The children of Butler Terrace need Him just as surely as the children of Hampton Cove.

In our own country, nearly 13 million children live in poverty. But our poverty is another nation’s wealth. According to UNICEF, 30,000 children a day die because of their impoverished lifestyle. This number could be drastically reduced if these children simply had access to clean drinking water. In Africa, 6,000 children a day are orphaned due to the AIDS pandemic sweeping across the continent. The International Justice Mission estimates that each year, 1 million new children are forced into the sex trafficking trade. It’s amazing how little the world has changed in 2,000 years.

I would say these children are the insignificant, the weak, the forgotten among us who most desperately need a word of hope. A word of truth. A word of Gospel, of Good News. Who will bring them to Jesus? Who will meet their physical needs that they might have their spiritual needs met? Who will pray for them? Who will bind their wounds? Again, I ask, who will bring them to Jesus?

May a spirit of compassion well up within God’s people.

If not us, who?
If not now, when?

Posted in Devotional, Jesus, Kids, Preaching, Scripture, Social Issues | Leave a comment

LOST Season Five: The Life and Death of Jeremy Bentham

Another good episode, probably not as good as I was hoping for. I liked it, but there were certain parts — the Walt scene in particular — that I just couldn’t buy. I’m happy if we just call it quits with Walt. I’d like to know what makes him special, why the Others took him, what happened to him at the Hydra, etc, but every time he makes an appearance, it just doesn’t work. Call it done with Walt, Cuse & Lindelof. Please.

It seems that Ajira Flight 316 landed on the “other” island (the one Jack, Kate, & Sawyer were taken to at the beginning of Season 3). The episode begins with Cesar rummaging through an office of some kind. The LIFE magazine he picks up dates to 1954, 50 years before the crash of Flight 815. We know Jack, Kate, & Hurley are in the Dharma days circa 1970s; is it safe to assume that these castaways are “stuck” in the same time period? At any rate, the scene ends with the reveal of a hoodie-wearing John Locke brought back to life. In another bit of helpful info, we’re told that Lapidus was able to land the plane and he and another lady (Sun, perhaps?) have decided to take a boat to the Main Island. I’m wondering what to make of Cesar and Ilana. Walt’s “dream” has Locke on the Island, wearing a suit, with people around him that want to hurt him. We’ll see if that comes true.

The rest of the episode is a flashback to Locke’s off-Island escapades. Somehow Widmore is now aware that the Tunisian location is an exit point off the Island. (He apparently did not have this information in October, 2005 when Ben turned the wheel. Widmore confirms that Locke has appeared in Tunisia 3 years after the crash of 815. The Locke / Widmore dialogue was perhaps my favorite part of the episode. Widmore tells Locke that he rose to the position of Island leader only to be duped by Ben into abdicating his throne and leaving the Island. (The Jacob / Esau connection is simply too rich for me to pass up. Wonder if a bowl of stew was involved?) As Jeff Jensen points out, now we understand Widmore’s comment to Ben in The Shape of Things to Come: “Everything you have you took from me.” Widmore wants Locke to return to the Island because “war is coming”. Who knows what this means? And we still don’t know which side is “good” or “bad” in this war.

Off the Island, Locke strikes out in his attempts to get someone, anyone, to join him in his odyssey. Sayid is content to build houses in the Dominican; Walt is in school; Hurley is still nuts; Kate has Aaron; and Jack…oh, Jack. Locke thinks he has failed to convince Jack as well, but it’s the Christian name-drop that finally does the trick. Believing he’s failed, Locke decides to end it all…when who should come knocking on his door but Benjamin Linus. I love it when these two guys share screen time together and this scene didn’t disappoint either. Ben talks Locke down from the ledge, only to off him when baldie mentions Eloise Hawking. Why? As Ben was leaving the room, I think we had an honest confession from him: “I’m going to miss you, John.” We all knew Locke had to die, but what was Ben’s motivation to keep Locke from committing suicide only to turn around and murder him? The episode closes with the big reveal: Ben is among the severely injured (wasn’t he already injured when he got on the plane?!), prompting Locke to quip, “That’s the man who killed me.”

Posted in Television | 5 Comments

Stream U2’s new album "No Line on the Horizon"

This is shaping up to be an absolutely great year in music, at least in my opinion. Many of my favorite performers have new releases slated for 2009. Springsteen’s Working on a Dream was released last month and after a dozen listens, it looks to settle in as my favorite Springsteen album ever. As far back as last summer, I was getting stoked about the news that The Avett Brothers would record their next full-length LP with uber-producer Rick Rubin at the helm. That album should be out sometime this summer. My buddy Scott has often bemoaned the fact that Michael McDermott isn’t a household name. I agree. The greatest singer-songwriter of our generation is set to release a new album later this summer as well. His last album, Noise From Words, garnered the top spot in my annual Album of the Year post back in 2007.

Next week, a little band from Dublin called U2 releases their 13th studio album. I’ve been a U2 fan for as long as I can remember. Their last two albums, How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb and All That You Can’t Leave Behind, are some of my all-time favorites. The Joshua Tree is probably in my Top 5. No Line on the Horizon has been billed as something of a departure from the “classic” U2 sound mined on the aforementioned albums. Instead, No Line may bear more in common with U2’s experimental albums of the 1990s, Achtung Baby and Zooropa. You can listen for yourself by visiting the band’s MySpace page where you can stream the entire album for free. A quick note: you have to click the album art in the left bar of the music player to pull up all of the tracks. I just finished listening to it and I loved it. My favorite track initially is “Moment of Surrender”, a track that, according to Bono, is to this record what “One” was to Achtung Baby, the emotional center of a creative and risky album.

Posted in Music | 2 Comments

Boston?

Sunny and I celebrate our 10 year wedding anniversary this August. We’ve been tinkering with the idea of a trip to Boston to celebrate. Obviously, I’d want to go to Fenway and catch a Red Sox game. But I’m wondering what else there is to do in Boston. I’m sure there are all kinds of nationally historic landmarks to see and whatnot. Just wondering if any intrepid readers have ever been to Boston. Help me out here.

Posted in Random, Sunny | 7 Comments

The Gift of Language (or Close Enough is Good Enough)

(This post is a continuation of the thoughts I posted here.)

We have to acknowledge that our language is incapable of encompassing the totality of God. Asking our finite minds to apprehend the infinite God is like asking a ladybug to write a dissertation on humanity. God is simply too great, too transcendent, too “other” for our language. Perhaps we come closest to describing God by saying what He is not. But even this is a futile exercise because our descriptions of what God “isn’t” (sinful, temporal, etc.) are simply descriptions of who we ARE and only serve to underscore God’s “otherness” all the more.

And yet, what sets us apart from the rest of creation, or at least the primary thing that sets humanity apart, is that we bear God’s image. This means many things: not the least of which, we are relational beings with the capacity to love and to be loved in return. This relating takes place through the gift of language. Although our words may be wholly incapable of capturing or “pinning down” the reality of God, these same words are at least adequate to express our feelings, thoughts, and desires. In this sense, the gift of language is an incredible grace. Language allows us to relate to one another. Most importantly, I suppose, language allows us to relate to God.

God gifts us with the capacity to speak words of praise and adoration to Him, to articulate our concerns and our fears in prayer. The gift itself enables us to thank Him for the good gifts He grants us. He even chooses to communicate the most important Message of all, the Gospel, within the parameters of a narrative, a story, a language construct that invites our consideration as well as our participation. All of this is possible because of the gift of language.

My youngest son is 20 months old. He is experiencing what my wife likes to call a “word explosion”. In the past several weeks, it has been a real joy for us to watch as Jack learns all kinds of new words. This week he’s learned “elbow” (he proudly holds his arm up over his head and points to it with a huge grin on his face) and “knee” (we’re still working on head, shoulders, and toes!). I also love hearing him say “knuckles” (it’s more like “nuk”, but it’s cute). But my favorite may be his names for his brother and sister. Joshua is either “Ja Ja” (which makes me think of Jar Jar Binks, unfortunately) or, simply, “Bubba”. Abby Kate is “Sissy” (which comes out more like “Hee-Hee”, also cute). Jackson’s names for his siblings are inexact to be sure. But they’re close enough.

And somehow, I have to think that close enough is good enough for Someone else, too.

Posted in Devotional, God, Gospel, Imago Dei, Kids, Theology | 2 Comments