MLB 2019 Predictions: American League

Here are my predictions and thoughts for the 2019 season in the American League.

There are some truly great teams in the American League, due in part to an inordinately high number of teams “tanking.” Each of these divisions are quite top heavy. I doubt we’ll see very many surprise teams sneaking in to these races.

Before the year started, I thought the Yankees were postured to be the best team in baseball. Of course, that was before they suffered a string of injuries to their stars: Severino, Sanchez, Hicks, Andujar, Stanton, Torres, Betances, Bird, Gregorius, Judge, Paxton, Tulowitzki…the list just goes on and on. And yet, the Yankees continue to stay afloat in the American League East. If they can ever get somewhat healthy, I still expect this team to play deep into October.

Boston’s bid for a repeat hasn’t started well either, but the Sox are still among the premier teams in the league. I’m worried about Chris Sale — he just doesn’t seem to be himself these days. And I’m honestly shocked Boston didn’t sign Craig Kimbrel to solidify the bullpen. Pennants can be won and lost in April just as much as in September. But this team is too good not to have a playoff share this fall, too.

I honestly didn’t expect Tampa Bay to be this competitive. But they continue to rely on different players in big spots: one night it’s Tommy Pham; the next it’s Austin Meadows; another night, Yandy Diaz gets the big hit; or there’s Brandon Lowe filling up a stat sheet. And the pitching looks great, too. Tyler Glasnow is looking like a Cy Young candidate. And they have the reigning Cy Young winner in Blake Snell. I don’t know if they’ll keep it all spring, but I’ll definitely be rooting for these guys.

Heading into the season, I figured Cleveland was the most surefire division winner in the majors. But they look pretty ordinary and I’m thinking their window as one of the elite teams in the game may have already closed. Minnesota has made some competitive moves during the offseason. Marwin Gonzalez, Nelson Cruz, and CJ Cron will lengthen the lineup considerably, and I think their pitching could be sneaky good. (Jose Berrios is a Cy Young dark horse candidate.) The Twins are really the only team that can challenge Cleveland in this division.

Out West, I have Houston running away with things. I fully expect Oakland to regress back to the pack and I don’t see any of the other teams catching the Astros.

AL MVP pick: A couple weeks ago, I might have selected Miguel Andujar as a surprise pick here. Of course, his shoulder injury on March 31 eliminates that savvy choice. And I could always go with Mike Trout, who will probably put up MVP-caliber numbers again this year. But I’m going to go out on a limb and go with George Springer. Houston will score a ton and Springer has the chance to be in the middle of plenty of rallies.

AL Cy Young pick: I really think Berrios is ready to break out. He could carry the Twins to the postseason with his killer fastball / curveball mix. I also like Tyler Glasnow.

AL Rookie of the Year pick: Eloy Jiminez is a stud.

Posted in Baseball, Sports | Leave a comment

MLB 2019 Predictions: National League

I’ve been meaning to make a post for several weeks, highlighting my predictions and projections for the 2019 season. With 10% of the season in the books, it’s still early enough to make substantive predictions and projections. Here are my thoughts about the Senior Circuit for the 2019 season.

National League

I had a feeling that the Dodgers were the best team in the National League coming into this season. Three weeks into the season, my opinion hasn’t changed. Their lineup is deep, if a little lefty-heavy. But Corey Seager looks like he’s fully recovered from last year’s injury and Cody Bellinger is playing like an MVP in the early going. What’s more, the lineup has been substantially lengthened by the fast starts of “role players” like Kiki Hernandez and Austin Barnes. This lineup is deep and can beat you in a number of ways.

As good as the offense has been, it’s the pitching staff that really sets the Dodgers apart. They have seven legitimate starting pitchers and a bullpen filled with power arms. The Dodgers can probably afford to manage their starters much like they have the past few seasons: taking advantage of the 10-day IL (formerly the DL) to give their starters plenty of rest in-season. I’ve watched this team a lot in the early going and they’re the real deal.

While I thought the Brewers would win the Central, I didn’t expect them to rival the Dodgers as the best team in the league. But I’m telling you: this team is going to score in bunches. Christian Yelich looks primed to defend his MVP award, launching baseballs into the stratosphere with ease. He’s a joy to watch, even as he mashes against my beloved Cardinals. But this isn’t just a one-man show. Mike Moustakas is a sneaky pick to lead the league in home runs. So is Travis Shaw. Jesus Aguilar hasn’t even started hitting yet and this lineup is still one of the league’s best.

Losing co-closer Corey Knebel takes some of the shine off of Craig Counsell’s bullpen, but this is still a strong squad. Jeremy Jeffress is poised to join Josh Hader at the back end and I wouldn’t be surprised to see the club add another power arm this summer. But if I were the Brewers GM, I’d be tempted to go all in and make a run at erstwhile free agent Dallas Keuchel. The Brewers have a glaring need in their rotation and Keuchel, while far from dominant, could provide plenty of quality turns in the regular season and could give Milwaukee 4-5 capable innings in a postseason start. There have been rumblings about the Brewers trading for Madison Bumgarner, but Keuchel can be had today if they’d just write the man a check. Regardless, this team is very good.

The National League East should be a fun division as there are four legitimate contenders vying for first place. I don’t think the Mets will be there all year, but I applaud their new GM for making some interesting moves. And you can’t count out any team getting 40% of their starts from Jacob deGrom and Noah Syndegaard. (Of course, Syndegaard likely won’t make every start. But I digress.)

The Phillies were projected to be about an 84-win team BEFORE signing Bryce Harper to his (then) record setting contract. But the Harper signing was just the final piece in what was a highly successful offseason for Philly. They also added Andrew McCutchen, JT Realmuto, Jean Segura, and David Robertson — four veterans that should be better than league average at their respective positions. This is another team that could probably use either Keuchel or Craig Kimbrel. Either signing could really push the Phillies into the upper tier in the National League. As it stands, they are still my choice to win this division by an eyelash.

Even though they lost Harper to their division rivals, the Nationals still spent heavily to invest in a starting rotation that should make them competitive. I think the Corbin signing was an overpay, but he was clearly the best starter on the market. Scherzer, Corbin, and Strasburg in a short series…ouch. Juan Soto will do his best to make Nats fans forget about #34, but the Washington hitter most primed for a career year is Anthony Rendon. He looks like a man on a mission this spring.

And what’s funny is that NOBODY seems to be talking about the Braves, the reigning division champs. That’s probably just fine with Brian Snitker and crew. I think the Braves are a solid starter away (Keuchel???) and I don’t see Ozzie Albies as a growth stock but they could still very easily repeat as division winners. Ronald Acuna and Freddie Freeman could be vying for MVP honors before the season is over.

So my division winners are L.A., Milwaukee, and Philly. When it comes to the wild card, I’m taking Atlanta and St. Louis, but who knows. I really think the Cardinals are much improved. Paul Goldschmidt gives them the impact bat they’ve been seeking for the past few years and I expect Marcell Ozuna to bounce back to his 2017 form. As always, the key will be the performance of the bullpen. If the early returns are any indication, the St. Louis ‘pen likely won’t be championship-level, but they should improve as the season progresses.

For the record, I love what the Padres are doing. Sure, they’ve overpaid for Hosmer and Machado, but they’ve augmented those moves by calling up their best young players to try and open the competitive window a bit sooner. In an era when GMs routinely hold back their best players to avoid starting their arbitration clocks (ahem, Vlad Guerrero, Jr.), the Padres are playing their best players NOW in an effort to field a competitive squad. What a novel idea. In the same way, I respect what Cincinnati did this offseason. I love how they bought low on Sonny Gray and Yasiel Puig. Those two moves could be huge.

NL MVP pick: You’re probably crazy to pick anyone other than Yelich right now, but I’m going to pick Harper. Dude looks motivated and I think he’ll carry Philly to the playoffs.

NL Cy Young pick: It’s probably Max Scherzer. But if I had to take a dark horse, I’d take Jack Flaherty of the Cardinals. He’s going to win one of these awards one year. Might happen early.

NL Rookie of the Year: Nick Senzel, Reds. Not sure if he’ll play 2B or CF, but he should be a fixture in Cincy for years to come.

Posted in Baseball, Sports | Leave a comment

Permanent Love: Grace in the Wilderness

Recently, my reading of the Old Testament has been greatly enhanced by John Goldingay’s excellent new translation, The First Testament. Goldingay, a well-respected Old Testament scholar, uses his Hebrew fluency to defamiliarize the ancient text for modern readers. For many readers of the Bible, terms like “salvation” and “righteousness” have become so familiar as to be devoid of much currency today. Thus, Goldingay uses words like “deliverance” and “faithfulness” as substitutes to jar us into a deeper understanding of well known texts.

One such passage that has resonated with me in my reading is Jeremiah 31, particularly Goldingay’s rendering of verse 3:

Yahweh said this: The people found grace in the wilderness, those who survived the sword. As Yisra’el went to find its rest, ‘From afar Yahweh appeared to me.’ With permanent love I loved you; therefore I’ve drawn you out with commitment.

Jeremiah 31:2-3, The First Testament

In the wake of judgment and exile, this word comes from on high: God’s love is permanent love. It is grace in the wilderness. It is rest. What follows is a vibrant promise of restoration, the ostensible outworking of this permanent love.

I shall build you up again so that you are built up, Miss Yisra’el. You will again deck yourself with your tambourine and go out in the dance of people having fun. You will again plant vineyards on Shomron’s mountains; planters will have planted and will begin to have the use of them. Because there will be a day when lookouts call out on Ephrayim’s highland, ‘Set off so we may go up to Tsiyyon, to Yahweh our God.’

Jeremiah 31:4-6, The First Testament

The realm of Yahweh’s permanent love is characterized by music and movement; by the sounds of joy; by the freedom to cultivate and enjoy the land once more and to safely journey into the presence of God. The realm of Yahweh’s permanent love is even described as a place where people are “having fun.”

Mission accomplished, Goldingay. Can you remember the last time you heard someone use the word “fun” to describe the realm of God’s love?

“With permanent love, I love you.”


I went to our local deli the other day and I noticed that the guy behind the counter had a lady’s name tattooed on the inside of his arm, right at the bicep. I caught myself thinking, “Boy, I sure hope it works out for them.” Maybe it says something about me, but I wondered what he would do about the tattoo if they split up.

But this is Yahweh. After all the times she has violated the terms of the covenant, he still speaks graciously to “Miss Yisra’el,” offering her grace in the wilderness with permanent love tattooed on his bicep.


Last weekend I spoke at a mental health conference spearheaded by several Christian counselors in our community and hosted by a local church. I am not a mental health professional but based on my 20-year ministry career, I was asked to speak on ways the church can respond to mental health stigma. I arrived a few hours before the opening session to work through some of the technical details for my presentation. The church lobby was filled with frantic “pre-game” energy as volunteers were busy setting up vendor booths and registration tables. But amid the clamor, I noticed a huge sign, unavoidable with massive block letters at the main entrance:


The conference organizers were making a bold declaration along the lines of Jeremiah 31. They were announcing the realm of Yahweh’s permanent love. Entrants were to be met with this immediate proclamation: “This is a place of grace in the wilderness. As Israel went to find its rest, you can find rest here. God loves you with permanent love.”

As I made my way through the lobby into the hallway, I noticed these same words were plastered everywhere, on posters and signs taped up on the walls: YOU ARE LOVED. While I can’t be certain that Jeremiah 31 was at the forefront of anyone’s mind when those signs were being displayed throughout the church building, I also can’t help but think that these ancient words found some level of fulfillment in our midst.

“With permanent love, I love you.”

Over the course of the conference, I was reminded of the essential nature of this message. One attendee described the bitterness she still harbored toward members of her former church who literally demonized her depression, seeking to “exorcise” her condition which they erroneously believed to be the product of demon possession. Another family shared with me the fresh pain of losing a loved to suicide just a few weeks earlier. Yet another attendee talked to me about her dissociative disorder and the anxiety and identity issues that accompany it. I lost track of the number of times people acknowledged the ways they had been abused.

As someone who is unqualified to speak deeply into issues related to mental illness, I knew I was out of my depth and I was grateful that so many trained mental health professionals were on hand to lend their expertise to the conference attendees. But I also choose to believe that the very articulation of these various circumstances are evidence that the Jeremiah declaration at the front door had been taken seriously. I choose to believe that these honest and unfiltered conversations occurred because these words were “tattooed” everywhere, announcing the realm of Yahweh’s permanent love. And I prayed that our dialogue represented a portion of Yahweh’s work of building up Miss Yisra’el once again.

This is the greatest knowledge of all: to know that you are loved. Maybe this knowledge will help my new friends find joy once again. I believe this knowledge leads us into a new realm. I believe it helps us survive the sword, to hear the sounds of tambourine and dancing again. I believe it delivers us into seasons of bounty and harvest and security once more.

There is grace in the wilderness.

You are loved.


Posted in Church, Empathy, Faith, God, Gospel, Scripture, Social Issues, Theology | Leave a comment

On “Rights”

We are a nation founded upon the principle — among others — of unalienable rights. The Declaration of Independence boldly speaks of truths that are “self-evident”, that everyone — men, women, children — is created equally. This verb choice leads to the noun form as well — to be created surely implies a Creator — and the Declaration makes this assertion explicit as well: “…that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

With such a high-minded prelude woven into our national identity, it is no surprise, then, that we have long been a people concerned with our individual rights. Advocacy on behalf of an individual’s or a people’s rights is seen as the highest good for many Americans. Even when those rights have not been satisfactorily upheld for certain subsets of our citizenry in our history — and in some cases, such rights were flatly denied — a course correction has usually followed, if not in the form of reparation then at least in the collective consciousness. We may not be able to right all of history’s wrongs, but we are certainly mindful of what it means to be “on the wrong side of history.” And such political and social self-awareness is one of the hallmarks of our time.

And so it is that on the week of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s birth — a national holiday — our news cycle has been dominated by stories pertaining to these “unalienable Rights”: the ugly episode at the Lincoln Memorial involving Black Hebrew Israelites, a Native American elder, and students from Covington Catholic School; and the Reproductive Health Act passed in New York state, ostensibly protecting a woman’s rights in the event that Roe v. Wade is eventually overturned.

When the Covington video first surfaced, the viral reaction was swift and emphatic: the white teenage male smirking in the face of a Native American protester, surrounded by a crowd of raucous and similarly-snarling white teens, was surely the latest expression of long held racial prejudices, white privilege genetically encoded and passed down to Generation Z. New footage seems to have tempered some of the initial outrage, making the ugly standoff a bit more complicated to parse. (And the ensuing interviews with all the major players have only made clarity all the more elusive.) And yet some still seem bent on vilifying these students not only for their actions, but for their MAGA hats, as if that were a crime in and of itself. Inevitably, the other side rails back: Does a 16-year-old teen have the right to stand wherever he wants? To wear the hat of his choosing? To smirk or not to smirk? Of course, the issue is entirely more complicated than that — in the Trump era, any such conversation is weighted down with years of border wall / travel ban / nationalism / privilege baggage — but at the heart of it all is an undergirding understanding of individual rights.

Almost forgotten in the Covington story is the fact that the students were in the nation’s capital to attend a March For Life rally. But with the signing of the Reproductive Health Act, abortion is once again at the center of our national dialogue. The RHA keeps abortion legal in the state of New York even if Roe v. Wade is overturned, but also decriminalizes abortions performed after 24 weeks of pregnancy if the life or health of a woman is at risk or if the fetus is not viable. The law removes abortion from the state criminal code, allowing nurse practitioners, physician assistants and midwives to perform abortions without threat of criminal prosecution. The bill is hailed as “groundbreaking” with New York Governor Andrew Cuomo saying, “Today we are taking a giant step forward in the hard-fought battle to ensure a woman’s right to make her own decisions about her own personal health, including the ability to access an abortion.”

Once again, the issue is an individual’s rights — in this case, a woman’s right to choose.

My thoughts on both of these issues are sure to be unpopular, even divisive in our quick trigger, outrage culture. Our echo chamber mentality surely works against us here. In the age of Fox News and MSNBC, we rarely, if ever, listen to voices that differ from our own. We grant our ideological opponents no concessions, no points, no nuanced perspective. So I doubt very much that I will change anyone’s mind by offering up my opinion here. I’m not under the impression that what I have to say is revolutionary in the least — and you certainly will find others who will articulate this same point in more lucid and compelling ways.

But as a Christian, it seems apropos to be reminded of the example of Jesus. I simply write this as a reminder to my brothers and sisters in Christ, first and foremost. But I am just naive enough to believe that the ethic promoted and lived out by Messiah would prove wise even in times such as these.

Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but made himself nothing, taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men. And being found in human form, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross.

Philippians 2

This is known as the Kenosis Hymn, based upon the Greek word kenosis, here translated as “made himself nothing.” It carries a simple meaning of “emptying.” In the Incarnation, Jesus — who was by right divine — empties himself and takes the form of a servant. He set aside the rights inherent to his divine nature and willingly chose the path of love. Paul looks to Jesus as the model of self-emptying love, one who willingly forsakes his own “rights” for the sake of love. Kenarchy becomes the new politics of love Jesus introduces, a refusal to use coercive power to seize power.

Jesus does not “grasp” for power — here the Greek word harpagmon, which is a contrast to kenosis. A better translation would be, “Jesus did not consider equality with God something to be used to his advantage.” Instead, he emptied himself of such compulsions through humility and love.

I would argue that our national dialogue could use some kenosis right now.

In our clamoring to one-up each other over which side is right and which side is wrong, a little bit of kenosis would actually go a long way.

I’m sympathetic to these Covington students — not because I think they’re in the right (I don’t) but because they’re kids. And kids do stupid things. And what happened at the Lincoln Memorial last weekend was a stupid thing. (I’m just grateful I didn’t come of age in the cell phone era. Lord knows I did plenty of stupid things when I was sixteen years old. And I’m pretty sure sixteen-year-old-me would’ve been right there in the scrum if the circumstances presented themselves.)

This is not to say “boys will be boys.” Yes, I know that their actions were part of a larger narrative and yes, I would agree that the behavior of the Black Hebrew Israelites was egregious and seemingly kickstarted this whole ugly episode. But the call to embody kenosis, in addition to honoring Jesus through faithfulness to his example, would have defused this situation before it escalated and became a viral phenomenon / political firestorm. Rather than standing firmly on the grounds of defending their “rights” (as is our cultural obsession), I would hope that a Christian education would be forming students more fully in the kenosis way of Jesus. When observed through this lens, the Covington Catholic story can be understood as nothing less than a failure of Christian witness.

With regard to the Reproductive Health Act, I cannot hail it as “progress”, despite the exultance of Governor Cuomo who directed New York landmarks to be lit in pink to celebrate the RHA’s passage. I side with those who would argue that the fundamental unalienable rights of the unborn are being further violated with this legislation. Advocates seek to couch the discussion as simply a matter of women’s rights, but this is only one piece of the conversation. In our secular wisdom, we have now determined that a fetus only qualifies as a created being at the moment of birth, that the unalienable rights endowed by the Creator only take effect when one emerges from the birth canal, not before. The most vulnerable among us — the unborn, those who cannot advocate for themselves, those who have no vote and no voice — have even fewer rights now under the RHA.

Rather than celebrating, we should lament. The rights of our weakest and most vulnerable citizens are NOT, in fact, unalienable, it would seem.

But again, kenosis. It was that kenosis spirit that prompted Jesus to relinquish his divine right and to subject himself to life in the flesh and death on the cross. His kenosis mindset is to be ours if we claim to follow him: as Paul says, have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus. A me-centered, rights-based perspective is the cultural norm. But for those shaped by the way of Messiah, an others-based spirit should be the norm. And for Jesus, this others-based perspective always focused upon “the least of these.” Such an others-based, “least of these” perspective would force us to consider the rights of the unborn in addition to a woman’s right to health.

Again, I am under no false notion that my opinion will change the minds of the masses. But I do pray that this kenosis spirit would continue to grow — among God’s people, among others — and that it might find a place in our discourse about our “rights” as well as our discourse over that which is right.

Posted in Culture, Faith, Kingdom Values, Missiology, Politics, Race, Scripture, Social Issues | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

2019 MLB Hall of Fame Vote

The National Baseball Hall of Fame will welcome a few more members into its ranks today. With the announcement set for a few hours from now, here is my analysis of this year’s crop of candidates.

The Shoo-ins

With half of the ballots being made public at this point, Rivera is still at 100% of the ballot, giving him a chance to become the first unanimous selection in MLB history. But MLB writers are notoriously fickle and I’m sure there’ll be somebody who decides to be “that guy” by withholding their vote from Rivera for some reason. But he’s a slam dunk to gain entry in his first year of eligibility.

And it looks like Edgar Martinez will also get the call in his 10th and final year of eligibility. As the voting electorate gets younger, it also becomes less traditional and more open to sabermetrics. Whereas the “old guard” seemed determined to bar the door to Martinez — who spent the bulk of his career at DH. But the DH is here to stay and it’s time for Martinez to be enshrined. Heck, if Harold Baines is a Hall of Famer, then Edgar Martinez is — and then some.

The Maybes

If I had a HOF vote, I’d vote for Mike Mussina. I don’t know if he gets in this year, but I think he should. The arguments have been made before: spent his entire career in the church softball league that is (was) the American League East, yet he was an upper echelon pitcher throughout. And with the Hall of Fame’s new floor — meaning, now that Jack Morris is a Hall of Famer — it’ll be inexcusable for Mussina not to get in.

I’m more torn on Roy Halladay than most voters seem to be. I never thought of him as a Hall of Famer and after looking at the numbers, I’m not overwhelmed. Check out Tim Hudson’s career numbers for a comparison. I never thought Hudson was Hall-worthy either, although both were very good pitchers at their peak. And if you vote for Halladay, why aren’t you voting for Andy Pettitte? This could get messy.

The Separate Category Guys

Bonds. Clemens. Manny Ramirez. Gary Sheffield. I don’t think any of these guys get in on this ballot, but it’ll happen soon. Once Clemens and Bonds go in, there is no argument for excluding Manny, Sheffield…even Sammy Sosa if he is still eligible by then.

Today’s announcement is sure to spark much debate and discussion. Can’t wait to see who gets the call.

Posted in Baseball, Sports | Tagged , | Leave a comment

New Year Meanderings

It’s January 18th and I’ve yet to make a blog post in 2019.

But there’s also this: it’s January 18th and a guy in my neighborhood still has his Christmas lights up. And on. Like, a bunch of them. Every night. So, in my mind, I’m still ahead of the curve.

I want to commit to writing more in the upcoming year — but I say that every year. The golden age of blogging was pretty brief, but I’m still plugging away, using this site as a repository for my random thoughts, baseball predictions, sermon notes, and book / album reviews. Honestly, I’m more interested in developing this platform than I am in spending much time on social media these days.

Pedro the Lion’s new album, “Phoenix”

Today marked the release of the first 2019 album to really grab my attention: Pedro the Lion’s Phoenix, the band’s first release under that name since 2004. I was only tangentially aware of Pedro the Lion back then, but I’ve been listening to the pre-release singles on Spotify for weeks and I was really excited about Phoenix. After a couple of listens, it has not disappointed. David Bazan’s lyrics are always layered, but it seems as many of the references here are literal, given that Bazan grew up Phoenix. As such, the record is an ode to home, to nostalgia, to growing up and getting out, with “Yellow Bike” as Exhibit A. Sonically, the guitars ring and wail, even glisten at times, lending a richness to the aural soundscape as Bazan works out where he’s headed by looking to where he’s been. A shorter summary: it sounds really good. Looking forward to digging in to this one in the weeks to come.

Posted in Blogging, General, Music | Tagged | Leave a comment

Best Books of 2018

Each year, I set a goal to read 52 books — one book per week for the entire year. I usually fall short of the goal — I think 2011 was the last year I hit the mark. For point of reference, I read 40 books in 2017 and 44 the previous year.

But by the time I finish the book I’m currently reading, I’ll be at exactly 52 books for 2018! Given that I read quite a few books that were 600+ pages this year, I’m pretty excited about this! One thing that helped was a subscription to Audible, Amazon’s audiobook service. I started the free trial back in September and quickly realized Audible was a great way to maximize my “reading” time while driving to work or taking a walk. Thanks to Audible, I was able to tack on another 9 titles to my reading list for the year, including Walter Isaacson’s 600-page Leonardo da Vinci biography. If you’re an avid reader, you really should consider an Audible subscription. I think you’ll like it.

Disclaimer: the title of this post is a bit misleading. It sounds like this is a list of the best books written in 2018; that’s not what this list is about. This is a list of the best books I’ve read this year. Several of these titles were released in 2018, but most of them were not.

Here are the best books I read this year:

My 2018 Book of the Year
  1. Yeshua:The Life of the Messiah from a Messianic Jewish Perspective by Arnold G. Fruchtenbaum. As I look back over these book lists I’ve been doing for the past 13 years, I see several titles that continue to influence my thinking: Grenz’s Theology for the Community of God; Doris Kearns Goodwin’s Team of Rivals; and last year’s Enneagram primer, The Road Back to You. I reference these works ALL.THE.TIME. and their ideas have been some of the more formative ones I’ve grappled with over the past decade. Fruchtenbaum’s Yeshua series (a four-volume set) ranks right up there in terms of magnitude and importance for me. Based upon over four decades of research, Fruchtenbaum — a Messianic Jew — challenges readers to understand Jesus and the New Covenant within a thoroughly Jewish context. And I would say this is more than just extracurricular Bible study; this volume has helped me understand the entire framework of the Scriptures in deeper and more meaningful ways. Fruchtenbaum’s careful exegesis and familiarity with the biblical land provide essential insights into texts and stories I thought I fully understood. Balancing scholarship with faithfulness to the Gospel, Fruchtenbaum answers questions like: Was the old covenant really nailed to the cross? Does the church replace Israel in God’s redemption plan? What did Jesus mean when he said he did not come to abolish the law and the prophets, but to fulfill them? Fruchtenbaum interacts with rabbinic resources to demonstrate the Jewish context of Jesus — or, Yeshua, to use his Jewish name. The full four-volume set also comes in a single abridged volume (see picture above) which might be a good place to start if you’re interested in reading more. If you are looking for a resource to expand your understanding of the Scriptures, I highly recommend this important and insightful book. I’ve not read anything like it this year — or ever, for that matter.
  2. Paul: A Biography by N.T. Wright. I picked up a copy of Wright’s biography on the life of Paul as soon as it was released in February and immediately began reading. Rich with insight from the world’s leading New Testament scholar, I would read this book again in a heartbeat. Like the best biographers, Wright makes Paul come alive in fresh new ways, even for readers like me who are familiar with the Apostle’s life and spend a great deal of time reading his teaching. My best summary of this book: Wright made me want to be even more like this fearless Kingdom emissary. Paul: A Biography would be yet another helpful volume to put alongside your Bible study resources.
  3. The Soul of Shame: Retelling the Stories We Believe About Ourselves by Curt Thompson. As I presented a series of messages this summer on the power of guilt and shame, Thompson’s book emerged as essential reading. A board-certified psychiatrist, Thompson constantly asks, “What story is shame trying to tell us?” And his response might surprise you: he argues that shame is being actively leveraged by the personality of evil to bend us toward sin. Shame grows when we listen to the voices telling us that we’re not enough. Not only do we feel bad, we begin to sense that we are bad. And that’s when shame has us hooked. I appreciate Thompson’s interdisciplinary approach to shame, ranging back and forth between neuroplasticity, the biblical narrative, the importance of relational vulnerability, and anecdotes from his own private practice. This should be required reading somewhere, given shame’s universal reach. (And Lauren Daigle’s “You Say” should be required listening during this required reading!)
  4. Rest: Why You Get More Done When You Work Less by Alex Soojung-Kim Pang. For several months this year, I subscribed to Michael Hyatt’s LeaderBox, a curated selection of texts focused on strategies for maximizing your leadership. I quickly noticed a recurring theme in much of the business literature I was reading: the connection between rest and efficiency. We often wear our exhaustion like a badge, bragging about the long hours we log as if our worth is somehow linked to overworking. But this is a wholly recent phenomenon in human history. Pang looks at a host of innovators in disciplines such as science, politics, art, and literature to demonstrate that deliberate rest is the key to even greater productivity, viability and health. As a believer, I couldn’t help but draw parallels back to Israel’s practice of Sabbath rest — a command from the Creator Himself, I would point out. Pang’s work challenged me to evaluate my own relationship to both work and rest. A must read.
  5. Factfulness: Ten Reasons We’re Wrong About the World — and Why Things Are Better Than You Think by Hans Rosling with Ola Rosling and Anna Rosling Ronnlund. This fascinating book was another Hyatt recommendation. Rosling argues against some of the prevailing assumptions of Western culture — that conditions around the world are getting worse; that extreme poverty has doubled in the last 20 years; that life expectancy around the world is decreasing, and so on. Packed with data (often in the form of colorful, easy-to-understand graphics) and supplemented with anecdotes, Rosling exposes our tendency to view the world as more frightening, more violent, and more hopeless than it really is. Thus the title: he argues for more “factfulness” in our understanding of our world. I don’t know if he’s right about all of this, but I sure hope he is. This important book just might restore your hope in the future.
  6. When Breath Becomes Air by Paul Kalanithi and Abraham Verghese. I don’t want to give away too much here. You just need to read this book as you make your New Year’s resolutions. And be sure you have some Kleenex ready.
  7. Redeeming Love by Francine Rivers. Sunny has been asking me for years to read this book and I avoided it for a number of reasons. But I finally relented this fall and picked up this re-telling of the story of Hosea and Gomer set in the American West of the late 1800s. Rivers writes an honest and complex narrative that forces us to consider the magnitude — and the cost — of both shame and grace. My wife was right: I should’ve read this book years ago.
  8. Black Klansman: Race, Hate, and the Undercover Investigation of a Lifetime by Ron Stallworth. Ron Stallworth, the first African-American detective in the history of the Colorado Springs Police Department, uses his real name and poses as a white man to infiltrate the local chapter of the KKK. If that sounds like the plot to a Hollywood movie, well…it is. Even more surprising is the fact that it’s also a true story, as delineated here by Stallworth himself.
  9. Leonardo da Vinci by Walter Isaacson. After covering the lives of creatives such as Benjamin Franklin, Steve Jobs, and Albert Enstein, it was inevitable that Isaacson would write about Leonardo. I knew nothing about the man when I jumped in to this volume, so it worked a little like an art appreciation course for me. But Isaacson gave me a deep appreciation for Leonardo’s inter-disciplinary genius.
  10. Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban by J.K. Rowling. Jackson and I read through the HP series this summer and this was far and away my favorite entry. Imaginative fiction like Rowling is important for someone like me who reads mostly non-fiction throughout the year.
  11. First in Line: Presidents, Vice Presidents, and the Pursuit of Power by Kate Anderson Brown. Before you see Vice, read this book about the sometimes rocky, rarely cordial relationship between our Presidents and their Vice Presidents.
  12. Lead Yourself First: Inspiring Leadership Through Solitude by Raymond Kethledge and Michael Erwin. As an introvert, I loved this book. If you’re involved in leadership in any capacity (and who isn’t), solitude is a vital practice. We live in largely unreflective times — because we are always tethered to our devices. Even when we’re “alone”, we’re not truly alone. We simply don’t build in time for solitude. Kethledge and Erwin draw on the practices of historical figures such as Winston Churchill, Martin Luther King Jr., and Aung San Suu Kyi to inspire readers to embrace intentional solitude.
  13. The Pastor by Eugene Peterson. I started reading this a couple of months before Peterson passed away this fall. I’ve read nearly everything Peterson has written and I’ve always appreciated his work. But this autobiography helped me know the man in a deeper way. If you’re involved in any kind of congregational ministry or if you’re just a fan of Peterson’s writing, you’ll enjoy this retelling of the man’s story.
  14. Desiring the Kingdom: Worship, Worldview, and Cultural Formation by James K.A. Smith. One sentence summary: we are what we love.
  15. This Is Our Time: Everyday Myths in Light of the Gospel by Trevin Wax. Wax’s exposes some of the more prevalent myths that permeate our world. This book inspired me to preach a series of messages on Gospel worldview this fall, using Wax’s material as a template.

That’s my list. I’d love to know what you’ve read this year that really inspired you.

Posted in Books, Culture, Discipleship, Faith, God, Gospel, Jesus, Kingdom Values, Ministry, Politics, Race, Scripture, Social Issues, Theology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment