AL East Preview

This year, instead of simply making predictions re: the upcoming MLB season, I thought I’d do something a little different. I thought I’d work up a little review of each division and the offseason additions and changes each team has made. I thought I’d start with the epicenter of the MLB universe, the glamour division of the AL East and the defending champion New York Yankees.

New York Yankees

Key additions: CF Curtis Granderson; SP Javier Vazquez; DH Nick Johnson

Key losses: DH Hideki Matsui; LF Johnny Damon; CF Melky Cabrera

Let’s face it: this isn’t a club that needed very many upgrades after winning the World Series last season. The Yankees are still a good team and should be the prohibitive favorites to win it all again in 2010. But this is far from a complete team. I understand Cashman wanted to stick to his guns, refusing to pay Scott Boras’ asking price for Johnny Damon. But I think this team will miss the veteran bats of Matsui and Damon this year. Expecting more than a couple hundred at bats out of Nick Johnson is foolish, despite his OBP other-worldliness. And who hits behind ARod? Curtis Granderson, a lifelong leadoff man? Nick Swisher? Posada? And other than Rivera, the pen doesn’t do much to scare me. But this team’s greatest strength is its starting pitching. I heard Tom Verducci on The Herd today saying that last year, for the first time in their vaunted history, the Yanks had four starters that made at least 31 starts each. With Sabathia, Vazquez, Burnett, and Pettitte, the Yankees will be just fine for the first six innings. If Cashman and Girardi would ever realize that Joba is best suited for the back end of the bullpen, this pitching staff would be almost unbeatable. As it is, they’re still really good and the class of the AL’s Boardwalk division.

Boston Red Sox

Key additions: SP John Lackey; CF Mike Cameron; SS Marco Scutaro; 3B Adrian Beltre

Key losses: LF Jason Bay; SS Alex Gonzalez; RP Billy Wagner

Theo Epstein — Boston’s wonder boy GM — has altered the look of this club over the past few years. The emphasis now seems to be pitching and defense; thus the John Lackey mega deal and the Cameron & Beltre signings. Just as the Yankees will miss the veteran bats of Matsui and Damon, I think Boston will miss Jason Bay’s steady bat in the heart of the order. One thing they won’t miss, though, is his league-worst defense. Former (and future) CF Jacoby Ellsbury should cover twice as much ground as Bay did in left. Boston may be even more pitching-rich than New York. Lester, Beckett, Lackey, Matsuzaka, Buchholz, and Wakefield give the BoSox both quality and quantity that few other teams can match. And the power ‘pen of Papelbon, Bard, Okajima, and Delcarmen might be the best in baseball. It should be quite a race between these two heavyweights once again. Thankfully I have the full month before I have to handicap this race.

Baltimore Orioles

Key additions: 3B / 1B Garrett Atkins; 3B Miguel Tejada; SP Kevin Millwood; RP Mike Gonzalez

Key losses: 3B Melvin Mora; RP Danys Baez; RP Chris Ray

Man, it’s been a bleak decade for baseball in Baltimore. The Orioles haven’t been to the postseason since my junior year of college (that’s 1997, for those of you scoring at home). Back then, Cal Ripken was still streaking, Rafael Palmeiro was clean, and the numbers 60 and 755 were still hallowed marks. Today, the O’s are currently the AL version of the Pittsburgh Pirates — usually mathematically eliminated by Memorial Day. It shows you how bad they are that their “major” offseason additions include a .226 hitting first baseman and a proverbial “innings eater” who has topped 200 innings exactly once since 2003. On the bright side, Matt Wieters and Brian Matusz should be with the big club all season, so I guess that’s something. Honestly, though, this team is awful.

Toronto Blue Jays

Key additions: SS Alex Gonzalez; C John Buck; P Brandon Morrow

Key losses: SP Roy Halladay; SS Marco Scutaro

This is another team that’s going nowhere. Before trading away Cy Young winner Roy Halladay, at least the Jays had a chance to win every fifth day. Now with Halladay gone, things look even more bleak. I’d take present day Jimmy Key and Dave Stieb over this collection of stiffs. Shawn Marcum? Ricky Romero? Mark Rzepcynski? These bums are the reason ARod got to 100 RBI last year despite missing the first six weeks of the season. I’d tee off, too, if I got an inordinate number of hacks against these guys. Despite impressive performances last season by youngsters Adam Lind and Aaron Hill, the offense is still pretty pedestrian. It says something when your cleanup hitter has a .400 slugging percentage…and he’s owed nearly $100 million over the next five seasons. Like I said, going nowhere…an apt description of both Vernon Wells and this team.

Tampa Bay Rays

Key additions: RP Rafael Soriano; C Kelly Shopach

Key losses: 2B Akinori Iwamura

Not a very busy offseason in Tampa, but I still like this club. I thought Johnny Damon would’ve been a good fit in RF and in the #2 hole, but that would’ve likely blocked the path of uber-prospect Desmond Jennings, who projects as Carl Crawford 2.0. The Rays still have that stable of good young starters — although I think they gave up on Scott Kazmir a little too quickly. Soriano will nail down the back end of the bullpen if healthy (which is a HUGE “if”). As for the offense, a steady core of Longoria, Crawford, Upton, and Pena will make the machine run. All in all, I expect Tampa to finish above .500 again, but I don’t think they’ll have enough to catch either New York or Boston for the division crown.

Posted in Baseball, Sports | Tagged , , , , , , | 4 Comments

LOST Season Six: Sundown

Let me say it up front: this episode was an adrenaline rush for me. Several classic scenes make this my favorite episode of the season thus far.

No matter the reality, Sayid seems destined to a life of torture, murder and…wearing the same ratty black wife beater. (How about a wardrobe reboot for this guy?) But the one Sayid tortures the most is himself. Despite his heart’s yearning for Nadia, he won’t allow himself to believe that he’s worthy of love. Nadia is married to Sayid’s brother, who uses Sayid’s feelings for her as a ploy for help. It seems that Sayid’s brother has been involved in some shady financial arrangements. He asks Sayid to use his “skills” to help protect him and his family. Sayid initially refuses, but we can all see where this is going. Our Iraqi torturer is like Pacino in “The Godfather, Part III”; no matter how much he tries to get out, they keep pulling him back in.

Those of you longing for a Keamy flash-sideways can finally rest easy. He and his little sidekick guy try to strong arm Sayid. (I love the line, “I make great eggs!”) Keamy was one of the surprises of Season Four — especially when he took Alex’s life — so it’s no surprise that we find him living out his wicked impulses in the sideways world. We could see this coming for miles: Sayid caps the two henchmen before bringing Keamy to justice as well. But the twist came at the end of the sideways-story. Jin is tied up in the freezer. How he got there is a mystery. But it looks as if our characters stories are beginning to converge in the sideways world.

Back on the Island, Sayid barges in to Dogen’s secret reading room / horticulture suite and demands answers. Dogen has a line that I think is very important: “For every man, there is a scale. On one side of the scale there is good; on the other side, evil.” Unfortunately for Sayid, Dogen was also right about his scale: by episode’s end, Sayid has fully given in — I think for the first time — to the darker side of his temperament.

We still should be asking ourselves who or what raised Sayid from the dead. Miles tells Sayid it wasn’t the Temple-dwelling Others; they were just as surprised to see Sayid alive as anybody. Could it have been Jacob? I suppose, but then why would Jacob do such a thing if Sayid would end up “infected”? It’s worth noting here that Jacob can’t even seem to raise himself from the dead. It’s probably more plausible to assume that Smokey is responsible for Sayid’s resurrection. If not him, then maybe it was “The Island”. Regardless, Sayid’s reanimation has now proven disastrous for Team Jacob.

At the Temple, Dogen downloads some significant mythology. For years, MIB has been trapped. But now with Jacob out of the way, he is free and he’s trying to destroy everyone on the Island. In fact, Dogen says Smokey is “evil incarnate”. And all along I thought that title was reserved for Urban Meyer. Go figure.

We learn that Dogen is lying to Sayid: Smokey can’t be killed. But what else is he lying about? Is MIB really intent on killing everyone on the Island? It doesn’t appear that way. He actually lets a good many of the Temple-dwellers to defect, including Sayid and Kate. We’re left again to wonder who the good guys really are in this conflict.

Did anybody else worry that Sayid was going to stab Kate when he saw her? I guess he didn’t because he knew she hadn’t died (since Dogen said MIB would approach as someone who had already died). But I’ll admit, I was worried there for a second. Sayid made a pretty quick decision, though, when he saw FLocke. Did you notice that the dagger had no blood on it when FLocke returned it to Sayid? When Jacob died he was spitting blood all over the place. Why is it that MIB has no “blood”? Is MIB really human? Was he ever human, as he claimed in his conversation with Sawyer a few weeks ago.

The scene between MIB and Locke is one of my favorites of the season, maybe of the series. FLocke tells Sayid to deliver a message for him; in return, FLocke tells him he’ll give him anything he wants. Sayid’s response was heart-wrenching: “The only thing I ever wanted died in my arms. And now I’ll never see it again.” MIB is convincing when his eyes twinkle and he asks, “What if you could?” I don’t know if FLocke can deliver on these kinds of promises, but I can only imagine what fun Terry O’Quinn is having with this character.

The scene between Claire and Kate was epic, too. We find Claire in a pit, humming “Catch a falling star and put it in your pocket…”, the same tune Kate used to sing to Aaron. Did you see how quickly Emilie de Ravin turned her performance on a dime when Kate acknowledged that she took Aaron off the Island? Another great performance. I almost got chills with her dementedly evil line: “He’s coming, Kate. He’s coming and they can’t stop him.”

I’ve been wondering why that baseball was so important to Dogen. (I keep looking for a Willie Mays autograph.) But last week’s sideways story tipped us off: it belonged to his son in this iteration of reality. Dogen was responsible for his son’s injuries, but at the 11th hour, Jacob stepped in and offered to save the young man. In return, Dogen would come to the Island to work for Jacob, presumably to protect it from MIB. (How is it that Dogen was the only one keeping Smokey out of the Temple, as Lennon claimed?)

Sayid gives in to his dark impulses and all Hades breaks loose. Smokey comes through and completely obliterates everything and everybody. I really thought Miles was toast until Ilana busted down the door. Did you notice that she asked about Shepherd, Reyes, Ford, and Jarrah? (And she called Ben “Linus”. What’s with all the last names?) Thankfully she knows her way around the Temple of Doom and all of it’s secret hiding places.

Question: Why couldn’t Smokey just bust in the Temple on his own? He tells Claire, “If I could do it myself, I wouldn’t ask you.” Clearly the ash has something to do with it. But then again we never see the ash get “moved” or anything. And then there’s the whole matter of Sayid sending the sundown message — “get out or die!” Perhaps this is where the whole notion of “the rules” fits in. We’ve heard Ben & Widmore discuss the rules; random Island boy reminded Smokey of presumably the same rules a few weeks ago. I guess maybe the rules govern who Smokey can and cannot kill. Maybe if people are given some kind of warning in advance — as Sayid warns the Temple-dwellers — then all bets are off. But maybe the rules dictate that Smokey can’t pull a sneak attack / ambush.

Unless you’re the pilot of 815.

Or Mr. Eko.

Or Nadine.

Or Bram.

Or Keamy’s crew.

Sigh.

Another great moment occurred at the end: the look on Ben’s face when he realized Sayid was “gone” was classic. Any reason to show Michael Emerson’s bugged out eyes works for me.

The closing scene — completely wordless — was incredible. FLocke, surrounded by followers, looking supremely satisfied after purging the Temple, marching off into the jungle to do who knows what.

Interesting little tidbit: Sunny noticed how often the time period of “two hours” occurred in this episode: Sayid was dead for 2 hours before coming back to life. Miles tells Kate that Claire had been back to the Temple 2 hours ago. Sayid tells Nadia he put the kids to bed 2 hours ago. I don’t know what it means, but hat tip to the ol’ wife. Nice job by you.

And where are Sawyer? And Jin? I’m guessing Sawyer stayed back to keep Jin company. Hopefully we’ll get to see some more of him next week.

All in all, I thought this was a great episode. What did you think?

Posted in Television | Tagged | 10 Comments

Things I Want To Remember, Vol. 4 (or “Thingers” for short)

Yesterday, Joshua was telling me about his finger, how he got a cut on it. From a distance, it sounded like he was saying the word properly. But when he got up close, that’s when I heard it:

“See, Dad. I have a cut on my thinger.”

“On your what?”

“My thinger. It’s next to my thumb.”

Thingers and thumbs.

Posted in Family, Humor, Kids | 2 Comments

New Blogs!

A quick house keeping item: you may have noticed a few new additions to my “Blogroll” sidebar on the left. My nephew Micah is a fledgling photographer and he’s had a photo blog for quite some time; I’m just getting around to adding it to my list, but I’m sure he’d appreciate it if those of you who are a little photo-savvy stopping by and giving him your thoughts re: his pics. I’ve also added a link to Allen’s new site; Allen and I went to high school together and he’s currently blogging some great Bible study thoughts as well as his reviews on some current reads. Finally, my friend’s wife, Kristen, has started a new blog this week; for those of you who know the Widicks, you will want to add her to your reader so you can keep up with their family.

LOST recap coming tonight. And I haven’t said anything about it yet, but am I the only one not really digging American Idol this year? Probably has something to do with that other little show that consumes most of my time / thoughts…

Posted in Blogging, Family, Friends, Television | Leave a comment

Sunday Night LOST Tidbits

EW has a bit of a scoop re: upcoming episodes of LOST. Nothing too spoilerish here, but if you don’t want to know anything, I suggest you stop reading here.

________________________________________________

According to an Entertainment Weekly reporter who chatted with the producers as they were gearing up to write the finale:

The answer is “yes” to the following: Will Richard and Ilana exchange some words soon? Will we see another painting by Bender? Do some of the characters’ last names have significance, particularly Jack’s? Is Jack married to someone we’ve met before? Was Jacob telling the truth when he said someone was coming to the island? Will we learn more about Hurley and Libby’s connection? Will we see Vincent and Charlie again? Will we learn if Desmond was really on the plane?

The answer is “no” to the following: Will we get a conclusion to the story of Ben’s love, Annie? Do the purple circles in Bender’s mural mean anything? Did Juliet’s ex-husband get killed by a smoke bus? Will there be a DVD release of the show in chronological order?

The answer is “maybe” to the following: Will the Hurley bird be explained? Will we see Walt again?

The answer is “no comment” to the following: Will we learn why women can’t have babies on the island?

Radio silence: After being bombarded with questions about the show for six years, Cuse said they do not plan on commenting on the series finale after it airs.

Final spoiler from Lindelof: “Water.”

__________________________________________________

So, quick recap:

Jack’s married to someone we’ve met before. I’m predicting it’s Juliet, although I suppose they could go completely against the grain and go with somebody like Libby.

And we ARE going to get some more info re: Desmond. I’m hoping he’s the one coming to the Island.

What do you think?

Posted in Television | Tagged | 2 Comments

The Sermon on the Mount 12

10Blessed are those who are persecuted because of righteousness, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

11“Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me. 12Rejoice and be glad, because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you.

Matthew 5.10-12

With this final Beatitude, Jesus transitions from these introductory insights into the Kingdom life to the first imperatives of his Sermon. “Rejoice. Be glad.” The cause for this jubilation? The inevitable revilement — and for some, persecution — that necessarily follows discipleship. Following Jesus naturally puts one at odds with the world’s power brokers. Jesus repeats this theme to his disciples in their final time together before his death:

18“If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first. 19If you belonged to the world, it would love you as its own. As it is, you do not belong to the world, but I have chosen you out of the world. That is why the world hates you. 20Remember the words I spoke to you: ‘No servant is greater than his master.’ If they persecuted me, they will persecute you also. If they obeyed my teaching, they will obey yours also. 21They will treat you this way because of my name, for they do not know the One who sent me.

John 15.18-21

I heard somebody say once that Jesus needs better PR. If you’re looking to start a movement, this isn’t how you go about doing it. If you’re going to deliver a manifesto about the true meaning of life — which is what Jesus is doing in the Sermon on the Mount — you don’t begin by talking about impoverished spirit, meekness, and martyrdom. But that’s exactly how Jesus begins this seminal teaching. The way of Christ is fraught with peril. For some, it will even cost them their lives. For this very reason, Luke will record two separate encounters in his Gospel where Jesus implores would-be followers to “count the cost” before enlisting (9.57-62; 14.25-35).

Jesus doesn’t mince his words. The way of Christ is the way of the cross. No servant is greater than his master. As they’ve done to Jesus, so too will they do to those who dare follow after Him. This truth calls me to evaluate my own engagement with the world. We used to tell the teens in the youth group, “If you were on trial for being a Christian, would there be enough evidence to convict you?” In anticipation of what Jesus is about to say next, we might ask: Am I losing my saltiness? Am I shining His light? It is precisely this kind of deep reflection that this final, climactic Beatitude calls for.

But to be even handed, we must also acknowledge the very truth this final Beatitude reveals: that there is in fact a blessing in store for those who choose the path of persecution, rejection, and revilement. By taking up our cross and following Him — even following Him to death, as Thomas once quipped (John 11.16) — we find blessing and joy that He has called us to shine His light into His world.

Clarence Jordan writes:

It seems to me that he said something like this: “Folks, this is it. You think you’ve already been through a lot. You’re just getting started. As you walked up these steps and came into my kingdom, I made it clear to you that you were thereby making an all-out commitment. I charge you now to be faithful to it, cost what it may. But don’t let them scare you or bully you or make you back down. Rejoice that you’ve been counted worthy to be on our side. You’re in a great company of prophets whose glorious past stretches back to the beginning of time and whose future has no end. So go to it. I’m with you.”

As we reflect on our engagement with the world, we dare not lose sight of the fact that our guide along the Way has not abandoned us nor forsaken us. Rather, He is right where He promised to be — with us every step of the way, marching alongside of us, leading the way to the Kingdom, still carrying His cross, imploring us to step where He has faithfully stepped first.

Posted in Gospel, Jesus, Scripture, Sermon on the Mount | Tagged , | Leave a comment

LOST Season Six: Lighthouse

So this was the classic pivot episode where our characters are all put into position for what comes next. The pace of this episode was more aligned with “What Kate Does”, more of a slow boil. But I really liked the episode and here are the reasons why:

  • Jack. I know a lot of fans can’t stand the good doctor. Maybe it’s his insatiable desire to fix everything, even when things don’t need fixing. Maybe it’s his whole “live together, die alone” mantra. Maybe it’s his rapid fire blinking whenever he receives a shocking piece of news. I don’t know. But I’ve always liked the guy. Tonight’s episode made me hurt for him. When Hurley asks him why he returned to the Island, I love Jack’s response: “I came back here because I was broken. And I was stupid enough to think this place could fix me.” I think our erstwhile hero has finally reached the point of breakthrough. Whatever the reason for Jack being on the Island, I think he’s finally ready to accept his destiny. This Jack reminds me of the time-traveling Locke who, when reflecting on the painful experience of Boone’s death that leads him to bang on the hatch door, says, “I needed that pain to get to where I am now.” Jack Shepherd has needed his pain — every heart-wrenching moment of it — to get to where he is now: sitting on the coastline, staring at the ocean, reflecting on his destiny. I don’t know where the story goes from here, but I’m excited about Jack finally living into the hero role. Oh, and I LOVED the whole mirror destroying thing. Very cool.
  • Hurley. Jorge Garcia may be one of the most unintentionally funny guys on television. The guy can read almost any line and crack me up. I love what the writers have done this season, pushing ghost-whisperer Hurley out front. I don’t know what to make of his interactions with Jacob (Is he dead? Undead? Good? Evil?), but I love the more prominent role Hurley is playing so far. But it seems that his Island buddy Jacob may not be the omniscient deity that some people think he is. Hang with me here: Jacob appeared to Hurley in the season premiere, telling Hurley how important it was to get Sayid to the Temple. Hurley followed orders, although not immediately — there was that whole matter of saving Juliet that they had to tend to. But we know that Sayid’s experience at the Temple did NOT go well; supposedly he’s “infected” and we assume he’ll eventually take sides with Smokey when this whole battle goes down. My question is this: If Jacob knew that the Temple baptistery was corrupted with murky water, why would he tell Hurley that it was important to get Sayid there? Maybe Sayid’s “corruption” is at least partially the result of Hurley and his friends not getting him to the Temple ASAP. But it still doesn’t make much sense for Jacob to have Hurley save Sayid if ultimately Sayid is going to end up playing for the other team. I think this is Jacob’s mea culpa. Does that make sense? It is interesting to note that Jacob is staring at the murky water at the beginning of the episode before he turns to give Hurley his instructions. It’s like he’s disappointed or something.
  • Claire. For the first 100 days of her Island “journey”, Claire was one of the most boring castaways this side of Paulo and Nikki, especially after she gave birth to Aaron. Remember her whole carrier pigeon idea to get them rescued? Craziness. But this new Deliverance-esque Claire is way more fun. (And crazy, for that matter.) It seems that Smokey has been really doing a number on her over the past few years. She doesn’t seem to have any recollection of losing Aaron before walking off into the jungle with Christian. But with Smokey’s appearance at the end of the episode — and with the revelation that he’s been Claire’s “friend” these past few years — I feel pretty confident that the Christian Shepherd we saw on the Island was an earlier manifestation of our Man in Black. According to Claire, both Christian and FLocke have told her that the Others have her baby. It’ll be interesting to see if Claire believes Jin’s lie about lying (I don’t think she does) and what happens when Kate inevitably meets up with Claire of the Jungle. Showdown next week?

In his LA X reality, we learn that Jack has a son, David — a piano playing prodigy (could he be the student of another piano playing whiz, Daniel Farraday?) who has communication issues with his old man. (And how cool / biblical is it that David Shepherd is a song lover who amazes audiences with his gift?) This flash sideways did more for me than any other to date; I guess I’m a sucker for the Daddy-son themes that this episode plumbed. Basically, Jack and David seem destined to play out the same tired relationship Jack and Christian experienced…until Jack reaches a place of brokenness and honesty and tells his son that his love for him isn’t predicated on any level of achievement or ability. “I will always love you. No matter what you do. In my eyes you can never fail.”

The episode begins in this LA X reality with Jack reflecting in a mirror again, this time trying to remember when he had his appendix removed. Of course, in the Island reality, Juliet removed his appendix toward the end of Season Four; but in this reality, Jack seems to have no recollection of this. He goes so far as to ask his mother about it, only to find out his appendix has been removed for years. But there’s something significant about what’s happening to these castaways in their off-Island realities. There are these moments in each episode — Jack with his appendectomy scar; Kate with the whale plush doll — where our characters seem to be experiencing deja vu. It’s like they’re aware of the significance of some of these things, even if they can’t put their finger on exactly why.

This moment is paralleled in the Island story, which begins with Jack looking at his reflection in a reflecting pool. But this reflection is in flux; the turbulence of the water keeps Jack from seeing himself as he truly is. I could make a sweeping reference to how this serves as a metaphor for five seasons of Jack story-telling…but you get the point, right? Things are going to be clarified somewhat for Dr. Shepherd in this episode, an episode that I think will reap huge dividends down the line.

It was also no accident that Hurley and Jack made that little detour at the caves. The producers are wanting to call to mind Adam & Eve from Season One. Remember these are the corpses they found, one male and one female, one holding a black stone and the other holding a white stone. Of course, these were alluded to last week with the much larger stones hanging on the balance in Jacob’s cave. Hurley’s question is one that we’ve been asking for a while now — what if Adam & Eve are actually two of our castaways who somehow end up back in time living out their days in quiet serenity in the caves? Is Hurley’s question a foreshadowing device? Or is it meant to through us off? This is one of the show’s mysteries that interests me the most.

Questions:

  • Jack has a kid. Who’s the baby mama?
  • Did LA X Christian leave his entire estate to Claire?
  • Where and when will Desmond fit back in to the story? Remember the words of Eloise Hawking, aka Daniel Farraday’s mum from last season: “The Island’s not through with you yet, Desmond.” I wonder when we’ll get the rest of that story.
  • So…candidates can do whatever they want? Interesting.
  • Who’s coming to the Island? Hero Jack? Or someone else?
  • And what was that thing in Claire’s baby bed? Talk about a Rosemary’s Baby moment. Yikes.
  • Why does Jack refuse the drink his mother offers him? He didn’t have a problem asking for an extra drink on the plane.
  • Did you notice the sign outside as Jack rushes into the school to see David’s performance? It reads: “Auditions. Williams Observatory. Welcome all candidates.” Is young David a “candidate” in the same way Jack is?
Posted in Television | Tagged | 6 Comments

LOST Season Six: Pre-Thoughts on “Lighthouse”

I’ve finally figured it out.

For weeks now, I’ve been voicing moderate levels of dissatisfaction re: the final season of the most daring and innovative show in network television history. Basically, I’ve had a really difficult time getting into the “alternate reality” or “alternative timeline” or whatever it is we’re supposed to be calling it. I’ve also been saying that this stage in the narrative process — 13 hours or so from the end — is not the time to introduce new characters (Dogen, Lennon, etc.) or give us “different” versions of the characters we’ve come to love (like Kate and Locke, whom we’ve seen featured in the new “flash sideways” episodes). And yes, I’ve even defaulted to the stereotypical mantra of many a forlorn LOST fan: it’s time for answers, Darlton! I have voiced these opinions — and more — right here on this blog.

But I’ve finally figured it out. It’s not the flash sideways per se that have been bothering me — it IS at least passably entertaining to get a glimpse of the “what if Oceanic 815 never crashed” reality. It’s not the introduction of the new characters that’s really bothered me that much either — there are relatively few of them this go around and they DO serve the narrative by giving us access to some of the Island mysticism that has always been an elemental feature of “the Others”. It’s not even the lack of answers that has bothered me, despite last week’s rant to the contrary.

What has bothered me so far is that the story-telling hasn’t been as satisfying as I’d hoped it would be. I realize this is completely subjective. And I realize we’re only a quarter of the way through the season. So I am totally giving Team Darlton the benefit of the doubt. They’ve always pulled it together in the past and they deserve some modicum of trust at this point. BUT, my frustration is that the flash sideways just hasn’t produced a satisfying result for me yet. And yes, I know they said we’d have to be patient with these sideways deals, so like I said, I’m prepared to judge the season as a whole, not as individual episodes. But after five seasons of “traditional” story-telling, it’s been hard to be satisfied with episodes that are 50% off-Island, alt-reality.

Anyway, I promise to stop bellyaching about this from here on out. I just felt the need to clarify and properly articulate the reason for my frustration thus far.

In other news, tonight’s episode is Jack-centric, which means it should be chock full of mythology. Can’t wait to see it. While we’re waiting, here are a few bullets to whet your appetite for tonight:

  • If you’re not reading Doc Jensen, you should. He helps make a lot of sense out of the myriad plot points and cultural references in a show like LOST. Sometimes his stuff is purposefully over the top (see his article here claiming that 80s iconic group Huey Lewis and the News holds the key to understanding the Island’s mythology). But you should at least read his thoughts here re: Sawyer’s hero arc; I sure hope he’s right about our favorite rogue pulling a long can on Smokey.
  • Here’s another interesting read on whether Smokey and Jacob are actually two halves of the same individual. (I know; out there, right?) But the article also comments on the possibility of the random boy from last week being the Man in Black’s son. Check it out.
  • Speaking of that kid, remember his comment re: “the rules”? He tells Smokey, “You know the rules. You can’t kill him.” LOST has long teased us about these “rules”. Ben and Widmore seem to subscribe to a gentlemanly respect for said rules, at least until Widmore murders Ben’s daughter, Alex. Smokey is fundamentally incapable of killing Jacob, at least on his own, thus the incarnation of Locke and the manipulation of Ben. And now this comment. As the producers teased in the podcast, whatever war is coming between Smokey and Jacob (or his followers), expect these rules to provide the foundation.
  • I hadn’t thought about until I watched the “Totally Lost” video over at EW, but it’s possible that we misread the names of at least some of the “candidates” scrawled on the cave last week. For instance, we all assumed “#23, Shepherd” was a reference to Jack. But what if it’s not? (Remember back in Season 3 when Danny quips something about Jack not even being on “Jacob’s list”?) What if the Shepherd listed here is actually Christian? Or “#42, Kwon”. What if it’s neither Sun nor Jin, but Ji Yeon? Could be. Something to think about.
Posted in Television | Tagged | Leave a comment

Cash: American VI

Johnny Cash's "Ain't No Grave"

So it’s no secret that I’m a Johnny Cash fan. I mean, I named a son after him, so clearly he’s been a big influence. So it’s with great anticipation (and not a little sadness) that this week marks the release of his last album, “Ain’t No Grave”. Excited because it’s a Cash album; sad because we’ll never again have any new music from this iconic performer. The album will be released Friday on what would’ve been the Man in Black’s 78th birthday and it marks the final chapter in Cash’s storied American Recordings period. Rick Rubin, wherever you are, thank you.

If you’d like to stream the haunting title track, click here. First time I heard it, the song gave me chills. This marks my own little three minutes of utopian auditory bliss, as the brothers Avett (another favorite of mine) provide appropriate levels of banjo and footstomp on this track.

Posted in Cash, Music | Tagged , | 4 Comments

The Sermon on the Mount 11

Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called sons of God. — Matthew 5.9

We often define peace as an absence of violence. This is not a terrible way to define peace, just an incomplete one. The Hebrews used their word for peace (“shalom”) to describe a state of wholeness and completion. Shalom is about living and living well, both vertically (with God) and horizontally (with others). Jesus has this in mind in Mark 12 when he teaches the two great maxims of life lived well: Love God (Deuteronomy 6) and love others (Leviticus 19).

With his teaching on peacemaking, Jesus appears to be making a politically subversive statement. Residents of first century Palestine were surely aware, as was the rest of the world, of the imperial propaganda with regard to peace, the “Pax Romana” as it has come to be known. Roman peace was the product of power. Assault, conquest, assimilation; this was the imperial formula for peace and a reflection of the sovereign rule of Caesar, a “son of God” in his own right. In contrast, the peace Jesus offers takes the form of powerlessness: turn the other cheek, go the second mile, lay down your own life, take up your cross. Jesus counters the empire’s vision of peace with the peace-producing love of the God He reveals.

But Jesus is also speaking a direct word to the Zealots in his audience, the revolutionaries bent on birthing God’s kingdom reign through militarism. Righteous indignation no doubt fueled the Zealots’ desire to prove that they were the true “sons of God” through armed hostilities. But Jesus will speak the same prophetic word to these brethren. The peace spoken of by the prophets will not be brought about by the sword and “eye for an eye” foreign policy; God’s sovereign peace can only be achieved through revolutionary love and self-sacrifice.

Clarence Jordan clarifies this well:

It is the Father’s nature to make peace. He is called the God of peace. His Son was called the Prince of Peace. Paul says, “He is our peace.” The consuming desire of God seems to have been voiced by the angels at the birth of his Son: “…on earth, peace!”

I write this just a few days removed from two tragedies in our community. Two weeks ago a ninth grade student shot a fellow classmate in the back of the head in the hall of their middle school. Last Friday, a faculty member at a local university murdered three colleagues and critically injured several others. This is where our definition of peace as absence of conflict breaks down. Clearly the weeks and months leading up to these events were devoid of such senseless violence, but for these two shooters, shalom has surely been absent for quite some time. We long for something more: something more than a monastic existence, reading Scripture on some remote mountain top, cut off from the rest of society; and surely something more than the godless humanitarianism that drives many of our celebrity telethon aid-relief campaigns. Deep in our marrow, at the core of our being, we long for each of these spheres — the vertical and the horizontal — to intersect, for things to be right with God and with others. This is the peace, the shalom, of which Jesus speaks. More than that, this is the peace which he lived to reveal, which he died to achieve, which he rose to bequeath to our weary souls.

Posted in Deuteronomy 6 (The Shema), Gospel, Huntsville, Jesus, Leviticus 19, Love God, Love Others, Scripture, Sermon on the Mount | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments